Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Journal of Nanoelectronics and Optoelectronics ; 17(11):1459-1468, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2309024

RESUMEN

Biosensors using opto electronics mechanisms are evolving as efficient (sensitive and selective) and low-cost analytical diagnostic devices for early-stage disease diagnosis, which is crucial for person-centered health and wellness management. Due to advancements in nanotechnology in the areas of sensing unit fabrication, device integration, interfacing, packaging, and sensing performance at the point-of-care (POC), personalized diagnostics are now possible, allowing doctors to tailor tests to each patient's unique disease profile and management requirements. Innovative biosensing technology is being pushed as the diagnostic tool of the future because of its potential to provide accurate results without requiring intrusive procedures. Because of this, this visionary piece of writing explores analytical methods for managing personalised health care that IP 203.8 109.10 On: Th , 16 F b 2023 14 53 21 can enhance the health of the general population. The end goal is to take control of a healthier tomorrow as Copyright: Ame can Scientific Pub shers soon as possible. Right now, the most crucial part of controllig the COVID-19 pandemic, a potentially fatal Delive ed by Ingenta respiratory viral disease, is the rapid, specific, and sensitive detection of human beta severe acute respiratory system coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) protein.

2.
J Physiol Pharmacol ; 73(3)2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2091455

RESUMEN

Systemic inflammation is a hallmark of severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Anti-inflammatory therapy is considered crucial to modulate the hyperinflammatory response (cytokine storm) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. There is currently no specific, conclusively proven, cost-efficient, and worldwide available anti-inflammatory therapy available to treat COVID-19 patients with cytokine storm. The present study aimed to investigate the treatment benefit of oral colchicine for hospitalized COVID-19 patients with suspected cytokine storm. Colchicine is an approved drug and possesses multiple anti-inflammatory mechanisms. This was a pilot, open-label randomized controlled clinical trial comparing standard of care (SOC) plus oral colchicine (colchicine arm) vs. SOC alone (control arm) in non-ICU hospitalized COVID-19 patients with suspected cytokine storm. Colchicine treatment was initiated within first 48 hours of admission delivered at 1.5 mg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg b.i.d. for next 6 days and 0.5 mg q.d. for the second week. A total of 96 patients were randomly allocated to the colchicine (n=48) and control groups (n=48). Both colchicine and control group patients experienced similar clinical outcomes by day 14 of hospitalization. Treatment outcome by day 14 in colchicine vs control arm: recovered and discharged alive: 36 (75.0%) vs. 37 (77.1%), remain admitted after 14-days: 4 (8.3%) vs. 5 (10.4%), ICU transferred: 4 (8.3%) vs. 3 (6.3%), and mortality: 4 (8.3%) vs. 3 (6.3%). The speed of improvement of COVID-19 acute symptoms including shortness of breath, fever, cough, the need of supplementary oxygen, and oxygen saturation level, was almost identical in the two groups. Length of hospitalization was on average 1.5 day shorter in the colchicine group. There was no evidence for a difference between the two groups in the follow-up serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers including C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP). According to the results of our study, oral colchicine does not appear to show clinical benefits in non-ICU hospitalized COVID-19 patients with suspected cytokine storm. It is possible that the anti-inflammatory pathways of colchicine are not crucially involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 33(1):20-25, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | PubMed | ID: covidwho-1151187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many factors have been identified which can predict severe outcomes and mortality in hospitalized patients of COVID-19. This study was conducted with the objective of finding out the association of various clinical and laboratory parameters as used by International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) World Health Organization (WHO)- ISARIC/WHO 4C Mortality score in predicting high risk patients of COVID-19. Ascertaining the parameters would help in triage of patients of severe disease at the outset, and shall prove beneficial in improving the standard of care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in COVID-19 Department of Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad. All COVID-19 patients admitted from 15th April to 15th July 2020 were included. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 56.46±15.44 years. Male patients were 225 (65%) and female 122 (35%). Diabetes (36%) was the most common co-morbidity, followed by hypertension (30.8%). Two hundred & six (63.8%) patients recovered and 117 (36.2%) patients died. Shortness of breath (80%), fever (79%) and cough (65%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Patients admitted with a 4C Mortality score of 0-3 (Low Risk Category), the patients who recovered were 36 (90%) and those who died were 4 (10.0%). In patients admitted with a 4C Mortality score of more than 14 (Very High-Risk Category), the number of patients who recovered was 1 (20%), and those who died were 4 (80%). The difference in mortality among the categories was statistically significant (p<0.001). Hypertension was a risk factor for death in patients of COVID-19 (Odds ratio=1.24, 95% CI [0.76-2.01]). Lymphopenia was not associated with statistically significant increased risk for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The ISARIC 4C mortality score can be used for stratifying and predicting mortality in COVID-19 patients on arrival in hospital. We propose that it should be used in every patient of COVID-19 presenting to the hospital. Those falling in Low and Intermediate Risk Category should be managed in ward level. Those falling in High and Very High Category should be admitted in HDU/ICU with aggressive treatment from the start.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA